Product ID:TR-110018
Date Published:30-Jul-1998
File size:1.14 MB
Sector Name:Nuclear Power
Document Type:Technical Report
FileType:Adobe PDF (.pdf)
Price:No Charge
This Product is publicly available.
Abstract
The steam generator performance degradation case studies in this report
form the foundation for an industry thermal performance database. The
database's plant-specific information can help utilities identify
causes of thermal performance degradation and develop remedial
measures.
Background
During the last several years, a significant number of pressurized
water reactor (PWR) plants have exhibited decreases in secondary-side
steam generator steam pressure. In some cases, the decreases have
caused reduced high-pressure turbine pressure and, hence, reduced
electrical generating capacity. A reduction of one percent in
electrical generating capacity in a typical PWR is equivalent to
roughly $2 million per year in replacement power costs, creating a
significant impact on utility revenue. In one plant, secondary pressure
loss of nearly 80 psi occurred; chemical cleaning of the steam
generator restored most of this pressure loss. Secondary tube deposits
were the primary cause of this plant's pressure loss. However,
secondary deposits are not necessarily the primary cause of thermal
performance degradation, as this study demonstrates.
Objective
To collect and evaluate plant performance history data from three
selected plants; to perform a global fouling factor analysis; to
quantitatively evaluate the best-estimate and bounding pressure
decreases associated with all potential causes of steam pressure
degradation for each plant in the study; to analyze available tube
deposit data and calculate the thermal resistance of the deposit
layers; and, to correlate changes observed in the thermal performance
in one plant with historical Dimethylamine (DMA) addition.
Approach
Investigators applied a global fouling factor analysis method to
quantify degradation in steam generator performance. In addition to the
detailed study of fouling effects due to secondary deposits, this
method accounts for changes in thermal power, primary temperatures,
heat transfer area (for example, due to tube plugging), and their
effect on performance degradation. Inputs to this analysis are thermal
hydraulic design data and plant instrument measurements recorded over
the operating life of the plants. These measurements include steam
pressure, primary temperatures, feed water flow rate, and the number of
plugged and sleeved tubes for each outage. In addition to the fouling
factor analysis, investigators studied other potential factors that may
contribute to steam pressure degradation.
Results
The report details relative contributions to thermal performance
degradation (indicated by steam pressure decreases) in three selected
plants due to secondary fouling and other sources. These additional
sources include power uprates, primary temperature changes or errors,
and tube plugging, each source acting alone or in combination. Fouling
due to secondary deposits can be a significant cause and, in fact, may
be the major cause of documented pressure loss at one plant.
EPRI Perspective
Steam generator thermal performance degradation -- manifested by steam
pressure decreases -- can be a potential cause of lost generating
capacity in PWRs. This pilot study identified factors that may
contribute to performance degradation. The three plants in the study
were a feed ring design plant (Union Electric's Model F plant,
Callaway), a preheat design (Houston Lighting and Power's Model E
plant, STP) and an older model 51 (TVA's Sequoyah). Analysts selected
these plants based on the severity of their pressure loss and other
factors. A fourth plant, TU Electric's Comanche Peak, was added later
to evaluate potential effects of DMA soaks on performance.
The study showed that none of the plants suffered severe fouling due to
secondary deposits, though it was a contributing factor. Major causes
included power uprates, hot leg temperature streaming, and primary
temperature decrease. Tracking the global fouling factor, installing
more accurate instrumentation, and characterizing the secondary deposit
properties can all aid in evaluating and remedying potential causes.
The plant-specific information and analysis results add to the industry
database of thermal performance information, thereby helping utilities
identify causes of -- and prepare remedial measures for -- potential
thermal performance degradation.
Note
For further information about EPRI, call the EPRI Customer Assistance Center at (800) 313-3774 or email askepri@epri.com